Furries PH Docs
Dashboard
Report system docs

Foundations

Local vs Network Records

How local watchlists, local bans, shared entries, cross-ban recommendations, network bans, and appeals differ.

First created Last updated

reportslocal-recordsnetwork-recordsaccess

Overview

Local records belong to a partner’s operational scope. Network records are reviewed or managed by FPH admin and can affect multiple partners. Mixing those scopes is the fastest way to make a bad safety decision.

Use the route and badge names to identify who owns the next action.

Scope model

flowchart TD
  report["Partner incident report"] --> localWatch["Local watchlist"]
  report --> localBan["Local ban"]
  report --> recommend["Cross-community recommendation"]
  recommend --> fph["FPH-admin review"]
  fph --> networkBan["Network ban"]
  networkBan --> partnerAppeal["Partner appeal"]
  partnerAppeal --> fphAppeal["FPH-admin appeal decision"]

Inputs and controls by scope

ScopeControlsSurfaceOwner
Local watchlistFurries PH action type = Watchlist, watchlist rows, local entriesNew Report, Manage Report, WatchlistsPartner with report edit rights.
Local community banFurries PH action type = Ban, ban scope = community spaces only, edit ban modalManage Report, BansPartner with report edit rights.
Local community + events banFurries PH action type = Ban, ban scope = events and community, edit ban modalManage Report, BansPartner with report edit rights; affects event registration.
Cross-community recommendationRecommend cross-community ban checkbox and cross notesNew Report, Manage ReportPartner recommends; FPH admin decides.
Network banApprove cross-ban decision, network ban scope, decision reasonCross-ban RequestsFPH admin.
Network ban appealAppeal reason, review notes, approve/deny appealNetwork Ban Appeal, Ban AppealsPartner submits; FPH admin decides.

Workflow

flowchart TD
  local["Local action needed"] --> watchOrBan{"Monitoring or restriction?"}
  watchOrBan -- Monitoring --> watch["Set Watchlist"]
  watchOrBan -- Restriction --> scope{"Blocks events?"}
  scope -- No --> community["Community-only ban"]
  scope -- Yes --> events["Community + events ban"]
  events --> recommend{"Network impact needed?"}
  community --> recommend
  recommend -- Yes --> fph["Cross-ban Requests"]
  recommend -- No --> localDone["Local record remains local"]

End-to-end operator runbook

  1. Find ownership: Identify whether the row is local, shared, or network-managed.
  2. Read source report: Use Detail to confirm action notes and appeal process.
  3. Pick the narrow scope: Use watchlist, community ban, event-impacting ban, or network recommendation based on evidence.
  4. Route network work: Send network decisions and appeals through FPH-admin pages.
  5. Record handoff: Include scope, owner, report number, and next decision point.

Common mistakes

Do not use a local ban edit to handle a network ban. Local controls affect partner records; network bans require FPH-admin decision or appeal review.

All docs